Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toddlercon

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete via WP:G3. I've never heard of this term being used in relation to works along this line and at best, this is a WP:NEOLOGISM that someone came up with one day. Normally works along these lines use the term "lolicon" or "shoutacon" to refer to anyone under the typical age of consent in Japan. I don't see where this term is frequently used enough in either English or Japanese to warrant inclusion in Wikipedia or even Wiktionary, so deleting it as WP:G3 or WP:A11 seems to be the only option here. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:25, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

=[[Toddlercon]]=

:{{la|Toddlercon}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Toddlercon Stats])

:({{Find sources|Toddlercon}})

Non notable terminology. Searching google with "とっぇこん" (Quotation marks included) provides less than two pages results, with most of them being repeats of the same link or this wiki article. Checking a few of the works listed in the article, the works themselves do not describe itself with that term. AFAIK the works themselves sound like one-shots or single volumes at best. The article itself is unsourced and gives the impression of original research or self published work. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 02:50, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 03:04, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete per WP:G3 this looks like a hoax. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:32, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - I've tagged it per G3 since "Toddlercon" brings up nothing but /b/ related stuff . –Davey2010(talk) 03:42, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.