Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tohfat-ul-Awam

:{{la|Tohfat-ul-Awam}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tohfat-ul-Awam Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Tohfat-ul-Awam}})

I can find no in-depth sourcing to show that this passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:14, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete Does not seem to meet notability guidelines. There might be coverage in Urdu but I do not speak that language. Hrodvarsson (talk) 23:39, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:55, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:55, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

• Delete lacks adequate sourcing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:02, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
• Delete - no actual compelling proof of existence, let alone of notability. Creating editor was blocked last year as a serial creator of articles that were subsequently deleted, and as a prolific uploader of unlicensed images that had to be deleted. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 00:45, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

::FYI - something seems buggy with the block notices. I just went to this article's creator's user page and the block notice is gone. I went to another user's page who I knew was just blocked for improperly moving a page and his notice is gone also. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 00:53, 7 December 2017 (UTC) Never mind - it was the contribs page, not the user page. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 00:54, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.