Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Meseroll

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:13, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

=[[Tom Meseroll]]=

:{{la|Tom Meseroll}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Tom Meseroll}})

Not seeing any substantial third party coverage fails WP:GNG, and WP:ENT, WP:PROF and WP:AUTHOR as well The Resident Anthropologist (Talk / contribs) 00:13, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Delete Everything I can find is self published, published by a PR firm operating on his behalf or mirrored from the same materials. I don't think he meets notability. Bob House 884 (talk) 18:35, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete I found no independent support for claims of notability in any of his fields. Article has no independent sources at all. Papaursa (talk) 01:51, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete for lack of evidence of passing WP:GNG. I found a couple matching hits in Google news archive but they were either press releases or trivial mentions, neither of which help show notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:36, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
  • delete it must be deleted. nothing notable as of yet. 149.68.97.25 (talk) 17:44, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete fails WP:BIO. only trivial coverage. LibStar (talk) 07:05, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.