Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Murphy (fighter)

=[[Tom Murphy (fighter)]]=

:{{la|Tom Murphy (fighter)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tom_Murphy_(fighter) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Tom Murphy (fighter)}})

Subject does not meet WP:NMMA. LlamaAl (talk) 03:17, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Redirect to The Ultimate Fighter 2 Subject has 1 UFC fight but remains 2 fights shy from a top-tier organization required to meet WP:NMMA. No significant coverage other than WP:ROUTINE for his events and nothing to suggest he meets WP:GNG. I am recommending the redirect because he participated in a notable reality television series in which a redirect of the cast would be common per WP:ENT. Mkdwtalk 22:31, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

::I don't believe he has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions (my bold). --LlamaAl (talk) 22:33, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

:::Seeming misunderstanding. You're citing the guideline criteria for notability for a standalone article for an actor. (my bold/joke) I'm not suggesting he receive a standalone article under WP:ENT. In fact, the oppose. In cases where people, as an actor (and not as an WP:ATHLETE, are notable only for their appearance on a prime-time series, and does not meet the policy, a redirect to the show is fairly common. Mkdwtalk 22:51, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Comment - May pass WP:GNG as the CEO of Warrior Roots if more information/references could be dug up on that topic. Luchuslu (talk) 23:18, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Redirect to The Ultimate Fighter 2 No objections to an individual article if additional significant coverage turns up on his work.Mdtemp (talk) 23:44, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.