Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Ross(Rugby Union)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Userfy. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) TheMightyPeanut (talk) 01:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
=[[:Tom Ross(Rugby Union)]]=
:{{la|Tom Ross(Rugby Union)}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Tom Ross(Rugby Union)}})
This rugby union player is not yet notable. He fails WP:NRU, not having played any match in a professional competition in his career. He has only played in the amateur John I Dent Cup and at youth level. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 02:56, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator – as per Nosebagbear's comments below, this can be treated as a WP:USERFY. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 01:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - As TheMightyPeanut has said, player has not played competitively as of yet, and hasn't yet been named in a National Rugby Championship squad yet, and so will not play professionally until 2019 at the earliest at the moment, so fails WP:NRU – User:HarriesssUser talk:Harriesss 10:13, 13 August 2018 (BST)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:29, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:29, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:29, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Userfy - the two above statements are evidently correct as regards notability. However, as the literal only (non-afd) edit is by the creator, a direct userfy seems a significantly more reasonable option that a straight delete. {{ping|TheMightyPeanut|CAPTAIN RAJU}} - please let me know if I've missed something that means delete is more appropriate than userfy. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:34, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
:: Yes, you're absolutely right. I'll withdraw the AfD request and treat as a WP:USERFY. TheMightyPeanut (talk) 01:57, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.