Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Whalen

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Tom_Whalen}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Tom_Whalen}})

notability; apparent self-promotion LoveGermanLit (talk) 18:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Actors and filmmakers, Authors, Poetry, Arkansas, California, Louisiana, and Virginia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:34, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
• Delete. I can't see adequate sources here. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:56, 22 September 2024 (UTC).
• Delete. Not sufficient on WP:PROF, WP:AUTHOR, or WP:GNG. I don't know any film-specific guidelines well enough, but I can't imagine screenwriter for an art-house film that got only 6 credit reviews (none top prestige) would suffice there. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 23:38, 22 September 2024 (UTC)

Keep Subject is notable and worthy for expansion Tesleemah Talk 07:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Even though the discussion appears to be moving into delete, we're not seeing due diligence per WP:BEFORE. Arguments lack detail (especially from the keep !voter).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 19:11, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.