Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom and Jerry: A Little Learning

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton Happy Holidays 13:52, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

=[[Tom and Jerry: A Little Learning]]=

:{{la|Tom and Jerry: A Little Learning}} ([{{fullurl:Tom and Jerry: A Little Learning|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom and Jerry: A Little Learning}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Prod for notability and lack of reliable sources expired. Declining Prod and referring here because the article was previously deleted via prod. I agree with the prod, looks to fail WP:CRYSTAL Jclemens (talk) 04:32, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Redirect Redirect to Tom and Jerry. Can be mentioned there. If this isn't a good idea for some reason then delete per crystal ball. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:00, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:00, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete: Per Crystal, this article says nothing about the film and isn't likely to be used as a search term. Ryan4314 (talk) 10:32, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Obviously, this won't be in anyone's stocking this Christmas. Mandsford (talk) 14:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. As the prodder, my reasoning was that this fails WP:NFF. A good faith gsearch turns up just 26 non-wiki ghits, none of which show notability (or really even more than rumors that it might get made); 0 gnews hits.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:03, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as being a bit premature. While Tom and Jerry have notability, there is simply not enough avaiable yet for this planned direct-to-video film. Bring it back when there is coverage in independent reliable sources. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:24, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - Fails WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NFF. — neuro(talk) 03:22, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - a comment from an unnamed writer - with nothing definite from either the studio, the producer(s), or the director is no evidence of its impending existence. This is clearly a violation of WP:CBALL - it doesn't exist until there is something officially saying a definite time of release. B.Wind (talk) 03:45, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.