Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom and Jerry (2011 film)

:{{la|Tom and Jerry (2011 film)}} ([{{fullurl:Tom and Jerry (2011 film)|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom and Jerry (2011 film)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non-sourced; violates WP:CRYSTAL mhking (talk) 21:40, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- treelo _radda 22:05, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- treelo _radda 22:05, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• Redirect to Tom and Jerry and protect. DJ 22:24, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• Redirect and allow seperate article if/when is is actually filmed. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 23:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• Redirect per Michael. Though lacking WP:NFF. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 01:13, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm going to skip the redirect. It's clearly a case of WP:NFF and lacking reliable sources, shouldn't be in the Tom and Jerry article. Niteshift36 (talk) 15:13, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
• Redirect to Tom and Jerry. Sharksaredangerous (talk) 15:04, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• Nevermind, SummerPhD is right so yeah delete it. Sharksaredangerous (talk) 18:09, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete No reliable sources whatsoever. A redirect essentially says the film exists, we can't even prove that. - SummerPhD (talk) 16:52, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete WP:CRYSTAL. --Pedro thy master (talk) 01:24, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete; redirecting from an unlikely search term is pointless. Consider Salting if the article is recreated without sufficient sources. Powers ^T 15:09, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.