Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tongai Dodo

:{{la|Tongai Dodo}} ([{{fullurl:Tongai Dodo|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tongai Dodo}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Article has no reliable secondary sources to establish notability --Explodicle (T/C) 18:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

• Comment. I removed the prod tag from this because the article says that the subject played in the Premier Soccer League in South Africa, which, if confirmed, would confer slam dunk notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:29, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
• Weak Delete I'm of the opinion that the WP:ATHLETE guideline is too lenient, and if we have to go to a lot of trouble just to confirm that he played professionally, then he's probably not really notable in a way that merits inclusion. Ray^Talk 22:02, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete - fails both WP:ATHLETE (as he hasn't "competed at the fully professional level of a sport") and WP:GNG (as he hasn't "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject"). A [http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-GB%3Aofficial&hs=Kex&q=tongai+dodo+jomo+cosmos&btnG=Search&meta= Google search] for "tongai dodo jomo cosmos" only brings up Wikipedia and mirror sites, so I don't think he ever played for them. GiantSnowman 13:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. GiantSnowman 13:07, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

• Delete - does not meet notability guidelines.. --Stormbay (talk) 23:02, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
• Delete No evidence of notability Spiderone (talk) 16:04, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.