Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toothbrush sanitizer

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) buidhe 00:03, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Toothbrush sanitizer]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Toothbrush sanitizer}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Toothbrush_sanitizer Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Toothbrush sanitizer}})

No need for a separate article. It can be easily covered on toothbrush article. Fails notability guidelines. Störm (talk) 19:09, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:56, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 00:15, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

  • Keep a [https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Toothbrush+sanitizer%22 Google Scholar] and [https://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&q=%22Toothbrush+sanitizer%22+-wikipedia Google Books] show how the design of these products have changed as well as studies done about their efficacy. --BonkHindrance (talk) 01:16, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep A quick WP:BEFORE search brings up several sources that can be used to expand the article. Many of them explain patents and the technology. There is even a [https://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/16/business/yourmoney/zapping-that-icky-toothbrush.html NYT Article] on it. AmericanAir88(talk) 04:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep per WP:NEXIST. I found the following sources:
  • "[https://www.newspapers.com/image/170535300/?terms=toothbrush%2Bsanitizer Start-up readies a killer device for toothbrushes]" by George Lazarus, Chicago Tribune (Jan 19, 2000)
  • "[https://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/16/business/yourmoney/zapping-that-icky-toothbrush.html Zapping That Icky Toothbrush]" by Brendan I. Koerner, The New York Times (Jan 16, 2005)
  • "[https://www.newspapers.com/image/235952242/ Man vs. toothbrush: Should we be afraid?]" by Karen Klages, Chicago Tribune (Feb 27, 2005)
  • "[https://www.newspapers.com/image/179013313/?terms=toothbrush%2Bsanitizer Housewares industry looks to arm against domestic threats]" by Jura Koncius, The Washington Post (April 8, 2006)
  • "[https://www.newspapers.com/image/150643684 Health Products Exposed]" by Dena Braun, Reno Gazette-Journal (Aug 4, 2007)
  • [https://books.google.com/books?id=jiOfBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA130&dq=%22Toothbrush+sanitizer%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiil8note7nAhXxIjQIHUCJADsQ6AEwAnoECAIQAg#v=onepage&q=%22Toothbrush%20sanitizer%22%20-wikipedia&f=false America Brushes Up: The Use and Marketing of Toothpaste and Toothbrushes in the Twentieth Century] by Kerry Segrave, McFarland & Company (2010)

:I added these to the article in a Further reading section, so that people who want to improve the article will have some sources that they can use. -- Toughpigs (talk) 05:05, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

  • Keep Article could be improved with the above mentioned sources. Burroughs'10 (talk) 21:17, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.