Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top That Publishing

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

=[[Top That Publishing]]=

:{{la|Top That Publishing}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Top That Publishing}})

Nothing to suggest that this book publisher is notable. Was originally a copyvio spam article, but OTRS permission was received to resolve copyvio issues. Step hen 00:30, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Delete. Maybe no copyvio anymore, but still pretty spammy. There's little to say on the topic, [http://www.google.com/search?q=Top+That+Publishing&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#q=%22Top+That+Publishing%22&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=BZl&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbs=nws:1,ar:1&source=lnt&sa=X&ei=kds4TfTrGI2ugQeMoOSzCA&ved=0CCIQpwUoBQ&fp=14f3c407689a056a see this search]. They have won some award, but it wasn't notable enough apparently to garner interest in the media, and a press release is all there is. Drmies (talk) 01:05, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.