Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toshi Yano

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. It appears that article is now sourced and notable per WP:MUSIC. I withdraw the nomination. vvvt 20:35, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[Toshi Yano]]=

:{{la|Toshi Yano}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toshi Yano}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Toshi Yano}})

The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Or at least I did not manage to find any. vvvt 03:56, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 04:11, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
  • Keep I found [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Toshi+Yano%22 quite a few]. Bearian (talk) 06:04, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
  • : Is that really a significant coverage? As far as I can see, there are only a necrologue of a person with same name and some bare mentions in articles about the band. vvvt 12:55, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 22:52, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Keep Did you click on "news" under "find sources"? NY Times, Washington Post, The Guardian, Entertainment Weekly, Rolling Stone, Boston Globe, Chicago Tribune, and others. This AFD should be withdrawn.Repo-Box (talk) 16:29, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
  • : See my note about the significant coverage above. vvvt 16:48, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

::I suppose whether the coverage is "significant" is a matter of opinion. The way I see it this is more coverage than 90+% of the content on wikipedia (and I am being very conservative in that estimate). So yeah, I'd say it's significant. If you don't think it is significant then you might consider tackling the 90+% of the content on Wikipedia with less coverage. Repo-Box (talk) 19:55, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

  • Keep. Very reluctantly. Like vvv I question whether the sources would ordinarily be enough for a stand-alone article. But WP:MUSIC states: "Members of two notable bands are generally notable enough for their own article." I think it states that for good reason: once a person is a member of two notable bands, there's no longer a viable redirect. As long as the membership of the multiple bands can be sourced (and here it can), you can have a basic sourced stub on the musician setting out the bands the musician has been a member of. --Mkativerata (talk) 19:43, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.