Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Totaro Murakami
=[[Totaro Murakami]]=
:{{la|Totaro Murakami}} – (
:({{Find sources|Totaro Murakami}})
No evidence of meeting WP:N's requirement of nontrivial coverage in multiple, reliable, third-party sources. The only coverage I could find in either English or Japanese was several iterations of his obituary (which mention little more than his death and that he was Japan's oldest man) and a handful of other trivial references. Long-standing precedent is that simply being the oldest person in a country is not sufficienty to meet the general notability guidelines and sustain an article (most recent example), thus the extent of coverage (or lack thereof) is the issue here. Normally a redirect to a list might work, but he wasn't even a supercentenarian, so I'm not certain where he would be redirected to. Canadian Paul 20:20, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - I'm afraid that being super-old is not a claim to notability. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:02, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. In the absence of any in-depth coverage, this surely comes under WP:BIO1E - someone notable for just a fleeting moment. --DAJF (talk) 02:06, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.