Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tour Sequana

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JGHowes ^talk 23:03, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Tour Sequana]]=

:{{la|Tour Sequana}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Tour Sequana}})

Office building does not meet WP:GNG- coverage in third-party sources is WP:ROUTINE and consists of an entry in a database of buildings and the announcement of a corporate tenant signing a lease. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:11, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:33, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

keep Presented as a landmark in the landscape of South-West Paris by various national papers (for example [https://www.lesechos.fr/2010/11/tour-sequana-deesse-de-la-seine-et-de-bouygues-434594]). Apparently notable.--Joe McNeill (talk) 15:24, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 22:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Keep per WP:BEFORE. Searching Google under Mozart I found plenty of sources. See [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Tour+Mozart%22+%2B+paris+-wikipedia&sxsrf=ALeKk01JBHCu7u-Kl1xQdyW5qP_fIIVPrg:1623264527791&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjNnbjMm4vxAhVwneAKHTdxD44Q_AUoAnoECAEQBA&biw=1366&bih=657], from which see [https://94.citoyens.com/2017/incendie-a-tour-mozart-de-saint-maurice,05-10-2017.html], [https://www.batiactu.com/edito/tour-elliptique-dans-ciel-parisien-diaporama-26832.php]. Bearian (talk) 18:53, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.