Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tourism in Bolivia

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. SNOW... Tone 11:26, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[Tourism in Bolivia]]=

:{{la|Tourism in Bolivia}} ([{{fullurl:Tourism in Bolivia|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tourism in Bolivia}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

WP:NOT#TRAVEL; procedural nomination, as I declined the CSD. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 03:32, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

:Delete - because it is a poorly written travel brochure paragraph. Just delete. Might make a decent article in the future but not now. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Bolivia#Tourism is good enough. Habanero-tan (talk) 05:21, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

  • Redirect to Economy of Bolivia#Tourism. Useful redirect, could some day be used as a title for a stand-alone article. Don't think there's anything in this article worth merging. Baileypalblue (talk) 05:47, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

:*Okay, I'll switch to keep, I'm pleased to see LinguistAtLarge writing a viable article on this topic. Baileypalblue (talk) 07:32, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

-----

  • Keep - this is an obviously encyclopedic and notable topic. The article just got off on the wrong foot. It needs cleanup, expansion, and references-- not deletion. I just gave it a lead paragraph. If we all give it 5 minutes, we can have a decent article in no time. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  07:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Note - I've essentially started the article over. It doesn't contain anything that it originally did. Now it needs some more expansion such as a "history" section and some statistics. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  07:27, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Great work, thanks! –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 16:45, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep. Nice save by LinguistAtLarge who has written a good start to an encyclopedia article. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:52, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Per LinguistAtLarge's improvement. I agree, this is an encyclopedic, and notable subject. This is more than a "travel guide" because the discussion about the growth and economic impact of tourism. This is a good stub to expand. --J.Mundo (talk) 14:35, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep Valid topic and valid article. Collect (talk) 16:01, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep. Nice work by Linguist, yet again. Drmies (talk) 16:34, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep. notable subject.--Caspian blue 17:13, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
  • Snow keep, with applause for Linguist.—S Marshall Talk/Cont 19:41, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.