Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracee Hutchison
=[[Tracee Hutchison]]=
:{{la|Tracee Hutchison}} – (
:({{findsources|Tracee Hutchison}})
Unsourced BIO on a living person, without cited reliable and verifiable sources the claimed notability can not be verified. Bidgee (talk) 11:31, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Bidgee (talk) 11:36, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Currently working on this Tracee Hutchison page. Work in progress. This is my first entry and am having to get up to speed with the protocol. However this takes time which I will have more of later on in the week. Please afford me some patience in this matter as I am a new user. Regards. --simonashford (talk) 13:08, 23 February 2010 (UTC) - Incubate So we have an active editor who is engaged in trying to write the article so that it passes WP:N using WP:RS. As long as there are not possible controversial remarks or blatant BLP violations let's give it a week or so and then review the article to see if it still needs deletion. I'm more than willing to assume good faith and give simonashford a week or so to get the article up to at least stub level with enough sourcing to meet BLP basic standards and policies. Nefariousski (talk) 21:42, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep high profile, long term journalist and TV presenter.The-Pope (talk) 06:33, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Subject is verifiably notable through the recently added sources, thus addressing noms concerns. Still needs cleanup though. Wine Guy~Talk 11:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.