Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracy Reibel

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:24, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

=[[Tracy Reibel]]=

:{{la|Tracy Reibel}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracy Reibel}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Tracy Reibel}})

Another long-term unsourced biographical article. From what I can see she is briefly mentioned in one book and one news article. While a worthy person I cannot find sufficient to get close to passing the biographical notability requirements. Just not enough reliable sources writing about her. Peripitus (Talk) 11:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Someone ought to go through all of the secret garden of National Maternity Action Plan-related articles for similar WP:N problems -- it's not even clear to me that NMAP is notable. THF (talk) 16:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Delete, non-notable activist - no significant coverage in reliable sources that I can find. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:59, 10 January 2010 (UTC).
Delete Per WP:BIO. Warrah (talk) 01:16, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.