Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traditionalist world view (American) (2nd nomination)

=[[Traditionalist world view (American)]]=

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traditionalist world view (American)}}

:{{la|Traditionalist world view (American)}} ([{{fullurl:Traditionalist world view (American)|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traditionalist world view (American) (2nd nomination)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log) WP:ESSAY, WP:SYN, WP:OR. Don't know how this ever passed last time, so I'm putting it up again. Neutralitytalk 23:44, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete Per nom - clearly fails WP:SYN and can't be salvaged given that it's an essay on a dubious topic. Nick-D (talk) 07:00, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete the entire page effectively consists of an essay, born of synthesis, written to reflect the editor's point of view. The title might have the possibility of an encyclopaedia article but none of the content here would be usable - at least not how its presented in its current form. Guest9999 (talk) 07:49, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete Not salvagable. Bin it. Alberon (talk) 11:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete lots of excisions in the text, but at heart it's still an essay on one person's theory of American politics. Mangoe (talk) 15:17, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Nothing to salvage here that I can see. JBsupreme (talk) 22:51, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.