Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tranby Croft (band)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 09:30, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

=[[:Tranby Croft (band)]]=

:{{la|Tranby Croft (band)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tranby_Croft_(band) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Tranby Croft (band)}})

I have been unable to find information in independent, reliable sources to demonstrate that this is a well-known band. The mention in the Book of Lists is less than one sentence. —Anne Delong (talk) 05:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:24, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:24, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Delete. Nothing claimed in the article hands them an automatic presumption of notability in the absence of reliable source coverage about them in media — "mentioned in The Book of Lists" is not a notability claim at all! — and I can find no evidence of the media coverage needed to improve this article at all. Even on a ProQuest search for deep pregoogle media coverage, I get just two hits on their name, of which one is a WP:ROUTINE concert listing and the other is about the Tranby Croft affair, not the Tranby Croft band. So there's simply no locatable evidence that they pass any notability criteria at all. Bearcat (talk) 16:09, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 12:03, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 09:06, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Delete as speculation and assertion by themselves are insufficient to demonstrate notability. — fortunavelut luna 08:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.