Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trash Inc: The Secret Life of Garbage

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:14, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Trash Inc: The Secret Life of Garbage]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Trash Inc: The Secret Life of Garbage}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Trash Inc: The Secret Life of Garbage}})

Non-notable television film, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 01:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:30, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:31, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 07:31, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete does not meet NFILM. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 15:17, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Changing to keep per the reviews from 👨x🐱 (HumanxAnthro). Seems like a lack of research on my part. Anonymous 7481 (talk) 13:41, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

*Delete Fails WP:NFILM Donaldd23 (talk) 18:54, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

::Change to Keep per reviews cited. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:09, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

  • Weak Keep. Reviewed in [https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2010-sep-29-la-et-secret-garbage-20100929-story.html The Los Angeles Times] and [https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-business-of-water-the_b_758801 Huffpost], [https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Trash+Inc%22+%22Secret+Life+of+Garbage%22&sxsrf=ALeKk01z0FpHHRrUpsVOtysKQz0te9OKyg:1625432908779&source=lnms&tbm=bks&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjq0Yi5qcrxAhXYW80KHQaQD90Q_AUoAXoECAEQCw&biw=1680&bih=877 plus found a few books citing the documentary]. 👨x🐱 (talk) 21:11, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
  • I would state that the coverage I found was very small, so maybe a merge into another article is another option. 👨x🐱 (talk) 15:29, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep as per the significant coverage linked above including The Los Angeles Times, Huffington Post as well as book coverage, passes WP:GNG imv, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:38, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.