Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travels with Li Po

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Travels with Li Po]]=

:{{la|Travels with Li Po}} ([{{fullurl:Travels with Li Po|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travels with Li Po}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Contested prod. The book does not meet the threshold standards set forth at Wikipedia:Notability (books), being available at [http://www.worldcat.org/search?q=ti%3ATravels+with+Li+Po&qt=advanced zero libraries per Worldcat] and is [http://hip.nli.ie/ipac20/ipac.jsp?session=1230855CR70R1.132019&menu=search&aspect=advanced&npp=10&ipp=20&spp=20&profile=bk&ri=&term=&index=AUTHOR&x=9&y=15&aspect=advanced&term=Travels+with+Li+Po&index=ALLTITL&term=&index=SUBJECT&term=&index=SERIES&term=&index=PUBLISH not catalogued by the National Library of Ireland], much less any of the inclusion criteria. There are no meaningful independent Google hits (web, book, news) for the title but for a blog which is the only source cited in the article. That reports that the authors were apparently sent a cease and desist letter based on alleged Harry Potter copyright infringement and that that made it into a local newspaper. That news item, even if confirmed with multiple reliable sources, does not confer notability on the book itself, nor does the fact that the artist's group, who apparently self-published the book, appear quite notable and are the subject of a separate article here.

As always, the creator of this article (or anyone else) is welcome to show us that "[t]he book has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the book itself," which is the basic relevant standard for encyclopedic inclusion.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:30, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete--coverages is minimal. There's one article from the Derry paper "Sunday Journal," and that's it. Not notable. Drmies (talk) 01:02, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete per nom. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.