Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treeball

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:07, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

=[[Treeball]]=

:{{la|Treeball}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treeball}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Treeball}})

Not notable, very VERY brief article. It was originally tagged for CSD as vandalism, but it's not pure vandalism. Bringing to AFD instead. Dusti^SPEAK!! 22:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Delete. Maybe not vandalism, but I think it still deserves a non-malicious speedy delete as being totally unremarkable and unsourced. -Quartermaster (talk) 22:26, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete Wikipedia is not for things made up in one day Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:14, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete - Made up one day fails GNG Shadowjams (talk) 10:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete - It is set to revolutionize outdoor field sports. When that revolution actualy happens, then an article might make sense. Until then, it's just something made up. -- Whpq (talk) 15:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Utterly fails to meet the requirements of WP:V. — Satori Son 18:08, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Delete Apparently a hoax. Written in March 2010 forecasting for Spring 2009? Not notable regardless. --Bejnar (talk) 06:57, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.