Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trigunayat

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and redirect to Indian name. No prejudice for recreation if sufficient sources can be found. Randykitty (talk) 16:51, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

=[[Trigunayat]]=

:{{la|Trigunayat}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Trigunayat Stats])

:({{Find sources|Trigunayat}})

Article is very confusing and it is hard to discern what the subject really is. Has no references, and is an orphan other than a talk page of a user that is long inactive. cyberdog958^Talk 07:55, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Delete. If anything, should be merged somewhere else. -- bydand•talk 08:42, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
It is an Indian surname. The content of our article is unverifiable, from what I've found. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 10:32, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:25, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:47, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Redirect to Indian name. Does not appear to be notable enough for a stand-alone article. Reserve the right to recreate if sufficient sources appear to establish WP:N. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:14, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.