Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troy Dean Harris

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:18, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

=[[Troy Dean Harris]]=

:{{la|Troy Dean Harris}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Troy Dean Harris}})

Contested prod. Autobiographical vanity article about a non-notable disciple of a non-notable guru. [http://www.google.co.uk/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=%22Try+Dean+Harris%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&redir_esc=&ei=x9XiTfW8FsGnhAfF48jyBw#q=%22Troy+Dean+Harris%22+-wiki+-facebook&hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&prmd=ivnso&ei=69XiTYf0GoW2hAe7nr3qBw&start=100&sa=N&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=164133a5b6804e31&biw=1454&bih=956 This search] has only 103 hits, some of which are irrelevant and none of which link to reliable sources. The references in the article mention him in passing at best and don't show notability. The only major contributors are the subject of the article and his puppet. andy (talk) 23:29, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

I respect your opinion and your understanding of the Wikipedia approach and protocol. I nominate the article for speedy deletion.

(tdharris (talk) 13:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC))

  • I've tagged it. andy (talk) 14:18, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Andy, I had the impression that the article was widely viewed as in violation of various Wikipedia protocols. I was expecting a number of people to contribute their views. Is it misleading to believe that you alone have objections to this article? (Kavipadma (talk)) —Preceding undated comment added 08:36, 4 June 2011 (UTC).

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — -- Cirt (talk) 17:35, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:49, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete No evidence that the subject meets the :WP:CREATIVE notability criteria as an art critic or curator; the remainder of the article is associative (correspondent, yoga disciple) but notability is not inherited. AllyD (talk) 09:09, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Inks.LWC (talk) 08:33, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.