Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuna Macaense

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Music of Macao. Black Kite (t) (c) 09:25, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

=[[Tuna Macaense]]=

:{{la|Tuna Macaense}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Tuna Macaense}})

Appears to fail both WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG. CharlieEchoTango 03:30, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:50, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:50, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete - The article itself does not make any claims to establish notability and cites no sources. I did a little google searching and couldn't find much of anything. they don't show up in the news, which isn't particularly meaningful. Searching books I found 2 English-language books that mention the band directly but without so much as an entire sentence devoted to the band. Of course, there's no requirement that sources be English-language. There may be entire books in Portugeuse devoted to this band but I highly doubt it. A look at the revision history shows only the article's creator has added or significantly edited content, and that was more than two years ago. Metal.lunchbox (talk) 19:01, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Delete - I, like Metal.lunchbox, searched for some sources that would establish notability, but only found some incidental mentions. --Noleander (talk) 20:04, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
  • Merge/redirect to Music of Macao, which already has most of the information in this article. As I think [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/08/world/asia/08macao.html?pagewanted=2 this] makes clear, the group does have enough notability to warrant a mention and a redirect there. PWilkinson (talk) 18:13, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.