Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tushies Baby Wipes
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Send to draft. Randykitty (talk) 12:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
=[[Tushies Baby Wipes]]=
:{{la|Tushies Baby Wipes}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Tushies Baby Wipes}})
Non-notable brand. TheLongTone (talk) 13:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
:Send to draft : I think there's a systemic bias problem here - baby care products don't seem to carry the attention in what we normally consider reliable sources. Even Johnson's Baby Wipes, which I would expect anyone to have become a parent in the last 20 years to instantly recognise, is a redlink, and there is a mere cursory mention in Johnson & Johnson. Does being stacked on the shelves of Boots make a product notable? In the case of Tushies, there are references to the product [http://www.amazon.com/Tushies-Baby-Wipes-Aloe-Unscented/product-reviews/B0015ZE45G here], [http://www.beamingbaby.co.uk/baby-products/tushies-natural-baby-wipes.html here], [http://www.goodguide.com/categories/152659-baby-wipes-reviews-and-ratings here], [http://www.netmums.com/coffeehouse/products-reviews-505/baby-child-essentials-545/273064-baby-wipes-warmer-all.html here] and [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=lBrznLFeo0gC&pg=PT93&lpg=PT93&dq=%22tushies+baby+wipes%22&source=bl&ots=_KS6tAjH_Q&sig=jbZXB5en4rIFVp7OBOzLt2GMfc4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CEwQ6AEwCTgKahUKEwiUuJyb09PIAhXIHx4KHfjTC0U#v=onepage&q=%22tushies%20baby%20wipes%22&f=false here], all of which seem to be independent, but also say nothing much more than "it's a box of baby wipes - boooring". Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:22, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari Hangout 15:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari Hangout 15:27, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- Draft and userfy if at all needed because I'm not seeing any obvious improvement here. SwisterTwister talk 20:36, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete or Userfy - I don't think it's a bias, I simply think that baby wipes are inherently not notable. Not enough to show notability. Onel5969 TT me 13:11, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
- Userfy, per {{U|SwisterTwister}}, and while we're at it, let's create more baby goods articles. Bearian (talk) 16:18, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOTCATALOGOFCONSUMERBRANDS -- RoySmith (talk) 23:55, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - individual brands of common household products like baby wipes are generally not notable enough for their own articles, except in exceptional cases. However, it would be notable enough for a brief mention in the article on the company that makes it. SJK (talk) 08:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.