Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tweed Run

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. Dennis Bratland (talk) 15:55, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

=[[Tweed Run]]=

:{{la|Tweed Run}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tweed_Run Stats])

:({{Find sources|Tweed Run}})

Fails notability. This event has been covered in a blog post on the Guardian website [http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/green-living-blog/2010/apr/13/doctor-who-tweed-run-cyclists] and some cycling blog posts[http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/latest/448985/tweed-run-limited-edition-attire.html] but it lacks the sustained, in depth coverage required by the notability criteria. The kind of annual events that typically have Wikipedia articles about them draw tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of participants. This event drew only 400 in 2010. Dennis Bratland (talk) 15:40, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

I had checked Google News, ProQuest and General OneFile, and didn't find significant news coverage. I'd forgotten that I just got a Questia login yesterday, and found significant coverage there. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 15:49, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.