Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UBackup

=[[UBackup]]=

:{{la|UBackup}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|UBackup}})

Not a notable topic. See [http://www.google.com/search?q=UBackup&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#q=UBackup&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=MDQ&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&tbs=nws:1,ar:1&prmd=ivns&source=lnt&sa=X&ei=tSZGTb2jHIH2gAfr2rD0AQ&ved=0CA8QpwUoBQ&fp=7277c93108171ecd this search], for instance. (Never mind that the article is written in an unencyclopedic tone, and occasionally reads like a manual.) Drmies (talk) 03:05, 31 January 2011 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

  • Delete - I can find no coverage about (mis)using Usenet as a means of backing up data in any reliable sources. That's not surprising as it is a really dumb idea. -- Whpq (talk) 17:51, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.