Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFO-Norge
=[[UFO-Norge]]=
:{{la|UFO-Norge}} ([{{fullurl:UFO-Norge|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFO-Norge}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
Although google search shows several ghits, none of them is RS, lack significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. No hint google news [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&num=100&lr=lang_en&as_filetype=&ft=i&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=all&as_rights=&cr=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=wn&q=%22UFO-Norge%22]. Fails WP:ORG. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 06:47, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith talk 16:00, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Does have independent press coverage, for example from Nettavisen [http://www.nettavisen.no/innenriks/article1642269.ece] and Avisa Nordland [http://www.an.no/nyheter/article789793.ece]. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:15, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wizardman 17:31, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Reliable sources have been provided by Sjakkalle; the article just needs a little tender loving care :) Kristen Eriksen (talk) 17:40, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, reliable sources obviously exist, and the fact that they aren't added to the article yet is no reason to delete the article. 96T (talk) 19:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.