Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UNSW Chancellors
=[[UNSW Chancellors]]=
:{{la|UNSW Chancellors}} – (
:({{Find sources|UNSW Chancellors}})
In and of itself not notable. This information more appropriately belongs on the University of New South Wales page, where there is also context. Qwerty Binary (talk) 02:25, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:26, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:27, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:27, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:27, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- Merge to University of New South Wales, assuming some source can be found to validate the contents of the list. Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:29, 15 August 2013 (UTC).
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 05:07, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
- Merge to University of New South Wales. Seyasirt (talk) 12:27, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
- Merge to University of New South Wales as the most obvious sensible solution. Useful information but a bit pointless as an article on its own. Stalwart111 13:14, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.