Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UPROXX
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. North America1000 01:32, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
=[[UPROXX]]=
:{{la|UPROXX}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|UPROXX}})
fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Widefox; talk 10:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Strong keep - easily passes GNG. This is a fairly well-known and well-discussed site. Here's a few articles - there's so much info that it's hard to wade through (Googling "uproxx -uproxx.com" brings 2 million+ hits, 33,000+ articles in Google News.) [http://blogs.wsj.com/cmo/2015/04/17/heres-how-fast-a-web-series-can-take-off-on-facebook/], [http://blogs.wsj.com/cmo/2014/04/17/the-edgy-male-targeted-digital-media-company-woven-acquires-uproxx/], [http://variety.com/2014/digital/news/showbiz-site-uproxx-acquired-by-guy-focused-digital-media-firm-woven-1201158843/] [http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/uproxx-launches-daily-news-show-781635], —МандичкаYO 😜 10:52, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:20, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:20, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:20, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:20, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep passes WP:GNG no questions asked. Reliable references, may need cleaning up though. --☣Anarchyte☣ 02:37, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense nom at best, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=UPROXX&oldid=664543271 that's how the article appeared] when the nominator started the AfD, and it already included substantial coverage from Variety, The Wall Street Journal, The Hollywood Reporter and more. If even the nominator was not satisfied with that coverage, a few minutes of WP:BEFORE would had easily provided more reliable coverage. Cavarrone 16:05, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.