Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U Started It (Gwen Stefani song)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 16:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

=[[U Started It (Gwen Stefani song)]]=

:{{la|U Started It (Gwen Stefani song)}} ([{{fullurl:U Started It (Gwen Stefani song)|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U Started It (Gwen Stefani song)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:

:{{la|Orange County Girl}}

:{{la|Fluorescent (song)}}

:{{la|Dont Get It Twisted (Gwen Stefani song)}}

:{{la|Wonderful Life (Gwen Stefani song)}}

:{{la|Bubble Pop Electric}}

:{{la|Serious (Gwen song)}}

:{{la|Danger Zone (gwen stefani song)}}

Unnotable stubs, none ever relased as single, no notable info. User is creating articles for all her songs, and recreating pages that were already deleted also. Nominated for PROD, user just removed the PROD warning, and wouldn't comment on the discussion page as to why they were disputed. The page names themselves aren't even all in proper grammar/punctuation/capitalization. This isn't a Gwen Stefani fansite, maybe create a Gwen Stefani wiki instead? Ejfetters (talk) 21:57, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Support deleting all these pointless stubs, per nom. Jonathunder (talk) 22:57, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep or merge/redirect; they don't necessarily need independent articles, but the info should be preserved. Everyking (talk) 03:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete - no assertion of notability. Biruitorul ^Talk 05:08, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Why not simply redirect them? Everyking (talk) 06:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
We could... Biruitorul ^Talk 14:31, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Redirect them to their respective albums, but material doesn't need to be preserved, because most of it is heresy and has no references. Keep only encyclopedic information that has irrefutable sources, otherwise delete information too. Ejfetters (talk) 18:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

::::Perhaps you meant hearsay. I don't think heresy was the intended meaning. Jonathunder (talk) 01:09, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

:::::Yeah sorry bout that, that's what I meant lol. Ejfetters (talk) 04:40, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Delete, fails notability per WP:MUSIC#Songs. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 13:20, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete Non-notable songs that didn't chart and otherwise fail WP:MUSIC#Songs. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 16:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete per WP:MUSIC#Songs --Kisholi (talk) 04:41, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Redirect to The Sweet Escape Sceptre ^(talk) 14:23, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete. All songs fail WP:NM. DiverseMentality^{(Discuss it)} 20:46, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Redirect to The Sweet Escape. There is not really any info on the article, but the page should not be deleted because more info may be discovered. Tezkag72 (talk) 02:27, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.