Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubet (company)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Ubet (company)}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Ubet (company)}})

Non-notable organization failing WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. The references aren't indicating any sign of notability. Chirota (talk) 06:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 06:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

• Redirect per below; that's a better solution. Iseult ^Δx parlez moi 02:55, 8 June 2022 (UTC) {{strikethrough|Delete per nom. Iseult ^Δx parlez moi 06:54, 26 May 2022 (UTC)}}
• Again, redirect to Tabcorp as a very valid alternative to deletion. Not sure why this isn't being suggested by the nominator. Deus et lex (talk) 10:35, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MaxnaCarter (talk) 11:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

• Redirect to Tabcorp as WP:ATD. I'm unable to locate any references that meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

:Redirect to Tabcorp. Ubet was rebranded to TAB with the 2017 merger to Tabcorp and Tatts Group. Plenty of media coverage to support this. Include Ubet information within the Tabcorp article. Mantuku (talk) 05:35, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.