Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubiratan Iorio
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:33, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
=[[Ubiratan Iorio]]=
:{{la|Ubiratan Iorio}} – (
:({{Find sources|Ubiratan Iorio}})
Doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG. Launchballer 17:40, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I find about 3 cites on GS. Many hundreds are usually required to pass WP:Prof#C1. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:16, 31 July 2014 (UTC).
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Seems to have a bit of a following among liberal/libertarian sites, but nothing that reaches WP:GNG. Short of WP:ACADEMIC indeed.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 09:45, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.