Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Udploris

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 04:02, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

=[[Udploris]]=

:{{la|Udploris}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Udploris}})

This entire article is untrue and the tool it describes is a non-functioning parody of the original SlowLoris tool, including a nearly direct copy-paste of the reference web site contents. Also does not meet notability requirements. Z0ZedNull (talk) 01:36, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:19, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:58, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Delete per the [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Udploris%22 lack] of reliable sources. Because this topic fails Wikipedia:Notability, and because this article fails Wikipedia:Verifiability due to the lack of reliable sources, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 22:54, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.