Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukachi Nkwocha

:{{la|Ukachi Nkwocha}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Ukachi Nkwocha}})

Test edit Maimai009 14:20, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Delete - The Nom rationale of "test edit" does not seem appropriate for an AFD, but while there is a claim to notability for this recently created article, there are no reliable sources to establish notability. Google news and basic web searches bring back nothing on subject. Also, it seems that WP:BLPPROD would be a more appropriate action here. --CutOffTies (talk) 14:31, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:22, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:52, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

• Delete No brainer. CutOffTies has got it right. Wickedjacob (talk) 07:45, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 01:16, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

• Comment If it is a test edit, shouldn't it have a speedy tag on it? Dennis Brown (talk) 15:03, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

::Reply: My take is the nom didn't understand the deletion process. Also, it is not a test edit. There is a claim of notability so it is not A7. IMO, it should have been WP:BLPPROD'd. --CutOffTies (talk) 16:30, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

• Delete - Fails to clear the inclusion-worthiness bar, which involves the use of verifiable independent source material on the subject. Carrite (talk) 22:39, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.