Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UltraMon

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:22, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

=[[UltraMon]]=

:{{la|UltraMon}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|UltraMon}})

A [https://www.google.com/#sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&safe=active&site=&source=hp&q=Ultramon&pbx=1&oq=Ultramon&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=3058l3970l0l4831l8l2l0l0l0l0l0l0ll0l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=4b3c420078196b39&biw=1920&bih=986 Google search] reveals almost no sources that would incur notability to this piece of software (in fact, only one Lifehacker article). Jasper Deng (talk) 04:25, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Keep. It's all about sources and it looks like they exist. The vendor's [http://www.realtimesoft.com/ultramon/reviews.asp reviews] page has a lot of broken or unhelpful links but it does list reviews by [http://www.pcworld.com/downloads/file/fid,25475/description.html PC World], [http://www.informationweek.com/news/personal-tech/science-tech/212500386?pgno=1 InformationWeek] that appear to satisfy WP:GNG. Msnicki (talk) 16:30, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Keep: the article looks promotional, but the topic may happen to pass WP:GNG: at least I found several sources, though I'm not sure about reliability: review (unsure about WP:SPS, see the notice at the bottom of the article),{{cite web |url=http://opcug.ca/public/Reviews/UltraMon2-1.htm |title=UltraMon 2.1 |first=Chris |last=Taylor |work=Product Review |publisher=Ottawa PC Users' Group |accessdate=2012-01-05 }} blog of Microsoft employee (he should have an expertise excluding him from WP:SPS; or no?),{{cite web |url=http://www.hanselman.com/blog/TheNearFinalWordOnMultiMonitorTaskbarsForWindows7UltramonVsDisplayFusion.aspx |title=The (Near) Final Word on Multi-Monitor Taskbars for Windows 7 - Ultramon vs. DisplayFusion |first=Scott |last=Hanselman |date=2009-12-31 |accessdate=2012-01-05 }} Microsoft itself,{{cite journal |url=http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2008.04.toolbox.aspx |title=Toolbox |first=Greg |last=Steen |journal=TechNet |publisher=Microsoft | date=April 2008 |accessdate=2012-01-05 }} review at TechRepublic (by editor called "Guest Contributor"!!!, but deep and well-written),{{cite web |url=http://www.techrepublic.com/article/solutionbase-add-invaluable-functionality-to-a-multiple-monitor-setup-with-ultramon/5229743 |title=SolutionBase: Add invaluable functionality to a multiple monitor setup with UltraMon |work=TechRepublic |date=2004-06-22 |accessdate=2012-01-05 }} Maximum PC's review,{{cite web |url=http://www.maximumpc.com/article/features/beyond_ultramon_free_software_solutions_multiple_monitors |title=Beyond Ultramon: Free Software Solutions for Multiple Monitors |first=Alex |last=Castle |work=Maximum PC |date=2008-10-20 |accessdate=2012-01-05 }} and some news site alike (but who knows?).{{cite web |url=http://www.technixupdate.com/ultramon-the-best-smart-application-for-multi-monitor-setup/ |title=UltraMon – The Best Smart Application For Multi Monitor Setup |first=Abhishek |last=Bhatnagar |work=technixupdate |date=2009-04-28 |accessdate=2012-01-05 }} — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 17:54, 5 January 2012‎ (UTC)

References:

View AfD to see references

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.