Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unbipentium (2nd nomination)

:{{la|Unbipentium}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Unbipentium}})

Redirect to extended periodic table; see my comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unbiunium. I'm not sure if the stuff about the self-coupling of the omega meson is enough to save the article. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 09:02, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

• Redirect in very much agreement with the nominator. Let's see: we have an element that hasn't been created yet but for which a name exists. There are infinite such elements. The only thing of interest here is the island of stability, but I don't think it's truly noteworthy until the element has been created and this has been experimented upon. Zakhalesh (talk) 09:05, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
• Redirect per above. This element doesn't exist, and there are currently no plans to synthesise it. Therefore all actual content is the article is the name "unbipentium", which comes trivially from the number 125. No relevant information whatsoever. JIP | Talk 10:40, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
• Comment. The previous nomination ended with closure as redirect to systematic element name; however, the current decision seems to be to redirect elements 139 and below to extended periodic table and elements 140 and above to systematic element name. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 12:40, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
• Alternatively, why not make an article for elements that haven't been created yet but which are believed to have some interesting property? Zakhalesh (talk) 17:17, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
• I would think that elements that have an interesting property and/or have been (mis)reported or are have had synthesis attempts should have their own pages. That means that element 119, element 120, element 122, element 124, element 126 and element 137 should be kept, and element 121, element 123 and element 125 should be redirected to extended periodic table until they become interesting by these criteria. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 11:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
• Also take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unbiunium (element 121) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unbitrium (element 123). Lanthanum-138 (talk) 11:10, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
• A small change to the above: given that the target-projectiles for unbiunium (element 121) seem to be reliable information, it would therefore move to the "have its own page" list. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 11:35, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.