Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unify4life

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:17, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Unify4life]]=

:{{la|Unify4life}} ([{{fullurl:Unify4life|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unify4life}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

There's enough at [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Unify4life%22+&btnG=Search+Archives&hl=en&scoring=a] to avoid a speedy deletion (from me anyway), but not enough to avoid AfD. Note the copyvio and the promotionalism. I'm not opposed to having something about Unify4life on Wikipedia, maybe a short article or just a mention, but not this article. - Dank (push to talk) 21:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- - Dank (push to talk) 21:24, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete as promotional material. Little outside references to help assert notability. Tony Fox (arf!) 22:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:11, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete as spam -- Whpq (talk) 19:28, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.