Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Kingdom Backgammon Federation (2nd nomination)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=United Kingdom Backgammon Federation}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=United Kingdom Backgammon Federation}})

Article soft-deleted in 2022, then recreated as a redirect to World Backgammon Federation, then recently recreated with no additional evidence of notability under WP:NORG. A WP:BEFORE search turns up no WP:SIGCOV in WP:SIRS. I would be OK either with outright deletion or with the restoration of a stable redirect per consensus as an AtD. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Games and United Kingdom. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:16, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
• Redirect: Caught my attention because it reminded me of a certain someone who happened to show up today. Regardless, fails NORG. No significant coverage. Probably qualifies for A7. Restore redirect (or delete) and EC-protect it. C F A 💬 18:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:46, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
• I'm not finding sources that count toward WP:N, so I think redirect is the right way forward. Hobit (talk) 01:27, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
• Delete As no organisation is exempt from notability requirements and this is lacking significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources. AusLondonder (talk) 15:08, 31 August 2024 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.