Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unitrans 4528–4535

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. (Note: This nom was malformed in that an AfD tag was placed only on the article named in the heading; the similar articles included in the nom were not individually tagged. Nevertheless, I see no point in fixing the problem and relisting again—the articles all deal with particular numbered buses owned by the same transit line, and the consensus for deletion seems clear enough. Call it IAR.) Deor (talk) 10:36, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

=[[Unitrans 4528–4535]]=

:{{la|Unitrans 4528–4535}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Unitrans_4528%E2%80%934535 Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Unitrans 4528–4535}})

More bus related memorabilia from Unitrans.

I also nominate:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitrans_4123%E2%80%934127

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitrans_2820%E2%80%932822

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitrans_4916%E2%80%934919

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitrans_4615%E2%80%934618

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitrans_4507%E2%80%934508

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitrans_3901%E2%80%933905

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unitrans_4063%E2%80%934067

Thanks aycliffe^talk 09:45, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

These should probably be deleted or at least removed from article namespace as indiscriminate information; some of the references and possibly information in the articles may be suitable for the Unitrans article but the titles wouldn't be suitable as redirects. Peter James (talk) 20:54, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:01, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Redirect/merge all into Unitrans; the contents of all eight articles would be best served by a section in Unitrans.--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 07:55, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete nothing to indicate that any of these individual buses is notable; these aren't routes but physical buses. Are we going to profile each uber car and driver, too? Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:44, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|96%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 21:02, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Delete per nom - This does seem "memorabilia" stuff, Not really seeing anything that can be Merged either. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 21:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete all per Carlossuarez. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:41, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Delete insufficient references from reliable sources to support notability. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 09:29, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.