Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal air filter

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Air filter. MBisanz ^talk 01:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Universal air filter]]=

:{{la|Universal air filter}} ([{{fullurl:Universal air filter|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal air filter}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Delete Wikipedia can probably manage without boy racers touting the benefits of induction kits. Mayalld (talk) 13:23, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Redirect to Air filter. --Lockley (talk) 13:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete This could have been speedied as spam? 82.32.73.70 (talk) 15:19, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
delete yeah, this is just spam and could have been speedied. Pstanton 22:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pstanton (talk • contribs)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 18:34, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Redirect to air filter. The term googles fine, but it seems to be nothing more than a variation on the regular filters. Until something solid is written, a redirect seems the most sensible thing to do. - Mgm|^(talk) 20:14, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.