Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal paradigm

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 20:01, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

=[[Universal paradigm]]=

:{{la|Universal paradigm}} ([{{fullurl:Universal paradigm|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal paradigm}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

The term "Universal paradigm" is not defined by reliable sources in the way it is in this article; in fact, it is not defined at all by reliable sources. Interestingly, Universal truth is a redlink on Wikipedia, something I spotted in the article. Deprodded. Abductive (talk) 13:43, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Delete: while there are many search engine hits for "universal paradigm" none of them are about this, whatever this is. While looking for universal truth here, I was also surprised to learn that we do not have an article about mathematical necessity. This would appear to be mostly patent nonsense as well:

    Supporters argue that the Common Elements are so basic and universal that they cannot be debated or disputed. As an example, one can go to any society and find the concept of "greater than". One can lay 5 same-sized stones on the ground in one pile and 8 identical stones in another pile and 100% of the people will agree that the pile with 8 stones is larger. This is considered a Universal Truth. ...

    Binary economics states that it is the expression of a new universal paradigm or new understanding of reality that creates a new economics; a new politics; a new justice and a new morality. In its economics aspect, binary economics is a market economics whose markets work for everybody rather than just a few; and it upholds private property but private property, again, for everybody rather than just a few.

    Was there a second step missing, possibly involving underpants? - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:41, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Almost looks like WP:NEO. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete. Article doesn't say what a Universal Paradigm is, and neither do the sources. --Pgallert (talk) 18:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom.Dino Velvet 8MM (talk) 04:10, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.