Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Up North (book)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 10:55, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

=[[Up North (book)]]=

:{{la|Up North (book)}} ([{{fullurl:Up North (book)|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Up North (book)}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Non notable book DimaG (talk) 20:02, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Delete non-notable as it meets none of the criteria set out here. Mm 40 (talk | contribs) 20:08, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete: A non-notable book. Schuym1 (talk) 21:37, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete - non notable, a quick google search turns up only hits for companies selling the book. Basement12 (T.C) 01:41, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep. I've put some sources in the article to show notability. There are more at [http://books.google.co.uk/books?num=100&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&q=%22Up%20North%22%20%2B%22Charles%20Jennings%22&sa=N&tab=np Google Books] and [http://news.google.co.uk/archivesearch?num=100&hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=pn&q=%22Up+North%22+%2B%22Charles+Jennings%22 Google News]. Phil Bridger (talk) 15:36, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Weak Delete didn't check new refs, but article is ordinary. WikiScrubber (talk) 07:35, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.