Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Usha Kirana

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 01:57, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

=[[Usha Kirana]]=

:{{la|Usha Kirana}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Usha_Kirana Stats])

:({{Find sources|Usha Kirana}})

Low profile, closed and a non notable brand. Presently non-existing. Clearly fails notability in all aspects. Bharathiya (talk) 01:04, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 17:27, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Keep Newspapers like villages make bad candidates for deletion because they existed for a reason. For historical purposes alone, but it has a major newspaper company involved in buying it out. Crtew (talk) 06:12, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 22:20, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Keep - agree the article was in bad shape and the nom was justified. But [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Usha_Kirana&diff=514914790&oldid=512100902 I added a few sources and cleaned it up a bit] and it probably now marginally passes WP:GNG, taking into consideration WP:NOTTEMP. Cheers, Stalwart111 (talk) 00:44, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.