Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ust

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. A verifiably extant settlement is never going to get consensus for deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 23:11, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

=[[Ust]]=

:{{la|Ust}} – (View AfD)(View log)

:({{findsources|Ust}})

A random village in Afghanistan with no notability at all, and is merely proving a haven for a bit of vandalism. The article wouldn't even be notable for a massively comprehensive atlas, nevermind an encyclopedia. It can also be barley verified that the village exists. Agent Blightsoot 16:48, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

  • Keep Per this, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Badakhshan_Province_geography_stubs this] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Croatia_geography_stubs this]. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 17:39, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment - Not only does the village appear on Google Earth but maps are also available on a [http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=afghanistan+ust&meta= google search]. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 18:01, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep if verifiable. - Altenmann >t 18:02, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep - As much as I dislike the concept of inherent notability, verifiable locations are generally notable. –Juliancolton | Talk 18:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep - It is a verified place. Towns and villages are notable regardless of size. An article being frequently vandalized is not grounds for deleting the article but to counter vandalism.--Oakshade (talk) 18:15, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep: A village. Joe Chill (talk) 21:11, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep: If a town exists, inherent notability applies as one of the few unbreakable rules around here.--Milowent (talk) 21:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.