Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uzma Begum

:{{la|Uzma Begum}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Uzma_Begum Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Uzma Begum}})

{{u|Shahrizal shahanshah}} (and their subsequently blocked sock) has been creating articles for characters of the Indian TV show Razia Sultan (TV series) (which apparently features some historical figures and a number of fictional characters), presenting them as historical. None of these article have sources to demonstrate their historicity and none seem to exist. This editor isn't responding to policy pointers and continues to recreate the articles when they're speedily deleted. Eperoton (talk) 03:54, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages, described above:

:{{la|Shazia Begum}}

:{{la|Shamshad Begum (Valide Sultan)}}

:{{la|Qutub Begum}}

:{{la|Zubruddin Mirza Rashil}}

:{{la|Nadira Begum}}

:{{la|Shah Turkan}} ({{u|Cpt.a.haddock}} has found a source for this one)

:{{la|Prince Yasir}}

:{{la|Fatima Begum (Validah Sultan)}}

Eperoton (talk) 04:05, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Eperoton (talk) 04:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Eperoton (talk) 04:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Eperoton (talk) 04:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

:: Shah Turkan is a notable entry. As noted above, I've added a source to the article and cleaned it up a bit. The others all appear to be minor characters at best and even if sources can be found for them, I don't believe they warrant separate articles.--Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 12:14, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

• Do not keep -- If her historicity can be established, merge/redirect to her husband (who if not another fiction) may be notable. If she is fiction, then plain delete. This is a comment on the first item. I rely on the nom as ti similar considerations applying to the rest. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

• Delete all (except for those stricken out) as a product of a sock farm and unsourced original research. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:38, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
• Delete/soft redirect to Razia Sultan (TV series). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:29, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
• Delete w/o redirect all that cannot be established historicallyDlohcierekim (talk) 08:34, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
• Delete all multiple attempts at communication with {{u|Shahrizal shahanshah}} have been ignored. Sockpuppets have been used by Shahrizal shahanshah to create and/or re-create previously deleted articles, a further sign of ignoring community concerns. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:26, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.