Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VASP Flight 210

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=VASP Flight 210}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=VASP Flight 210}})

Does not appear to be a sufficiently notable accident to merit a standalone article. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:24, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Brazil. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:24, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and Aviation. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:35, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
• Keep. A crash of a scheduled airliner resulting in injuries and the destruction of the aircraft meets longstanding consensus for notability. News coverage of the event was picked up by at least the Associated Press and published across the U.S., although since it happened on the same day as the Challenger Space Shuttle explosion it ended up somewhat buried in the news. RecycledPixels (talk) 18:13, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
• Keep per {{u|RecycledPixels}}; a fatility accident involving a commercial airliner meets longtime community consensus for notability. Carguychris (talk) 13:30, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
• Keep – As already pointed out, accidents to major airliners with casualties or hull losses are routinely given their own article within wikiproject Aviation, even if sources may be scant in some parts of the world or for decades-old events. --Deeday-UK (talk) 08:51, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
• Delete not a significant event. A plane went off the end of a runway with one death nine injuries. We do not have WP:SUSTAINED coverage. As an ATD we can redirect to VASP. Bruxton (talk) 22:35, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

:

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

• Keep - Airline accidents, particularly those involving a hull loss or death, are routinely covered by a single article. Minor incidents involving no injuries, fatalities, or serious airliner damage may be better included within the "accidents/incidents" section of the relevant airline. In this case, there was a fatality, several serious injuries, and so I think this is fine to include as a stand alone article. Distinct care needs to be taken when considering events or article subjects that pre-date the internet age. There is already some coverage included in the article, more coverage is likely to be present in paper materials not reachable through a quick Google. I'd be happy to see this kept for these reasons. MaxnaCarta (talk) 05:28, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.