Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VESC

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 18:59, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

=[[:VESC]]=

:{{la|VESC}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/VESC Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|VESC}})

I can't find much about this technology at all. Google turns up mostly sales pages. Nothing in Gbooks Some Hackday stuff in Gnews. PROD declined by article author. Fails WP:GNG. Mr. Vernon (talk) 07:37, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

This the technology that is used in almost all high-powered applications including skateboards. It is the only viable open source ESC. If you cannot find something on it yourself does not mean that it does not exist. Also the technology being sold as a product on some websites does not discount the fact it is novel and important. In addition to all this, I spent a lot of time gathering resources about the topic and every point in the article is referenced.--M. Hassan talk here 15:14, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

:{{ping|mohamedhp}} The sources you used in the article for referencing are consisting of deadlinks, self-published and user-generated contents. Can you please add references from independent reliable sources? KartikeyaS343 (talk) 16:25, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Mr. Vernon (talk) 07:37, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Delete Unfortunately, hard work and verified existence are not indicators of notability. "Notability" in these discussions means something a bit different than it does in normal English usage. The general notability guideline is that there should be evidence of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources for an article subject to be considered notable. The sources presented in the article do not demonstrate those qualities. All of the sources cannot be considered independent as they are from people and organizations either developing or selling these controllers. These sources do not demonstrate that this technology has made any impact beyond a small circle of enthusiasts. I hope this helps explain things. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:27, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.