Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VWorker

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:27, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

=[[VWorker]]=

:{{la|VWorker}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|VWorker}})

Tagged for speedy, may be borderline notable. I am neutral. Black Kite (t) (c) 09:58, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Keep. Notable per mentions in Wall Street Journal and Inc. magazine. Also, represents a development in the automation and globalization of marketplaces which makes it notable. Jonathanwallace (talk) 12:57, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Delete. References to [http://www.inc.com/inc5000/2009/company-profile.html?id=200934610 top 5000 lists], even [http://www.entrepreneur.com/magazine/entrepreneur/2010/june/206722-7.html top 100 lists], and incidental mentions in stories about unrelated matters like [http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB113754697326149204-NKFrIswaO84O8r41rKK3Y9RKYVg_20070117.html cheating on school assignments] do not establish notability. The one bit of relatively substantial coverage seems to relate to the fact that somehow [http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4186130 data about children enrolled in day care] was publicly posted to the site. I don't think these references make the business notable. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:18, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.